And here we are, a few hours later.
If you actually overlay my attempt and the original, nothing is "right". Shapes are different, proportions are "wrong". I've never been one for copying things 1:1 from the left to the right, it's extremely tedious, particularly in digital, because of the zoom level and brushes that can be one pixel or the size of a house. I can do it, I've done it plenty of times, but I absolutely hate it because it involves more measuring than I can tolerate.
But the funny thing is, if you overlay enough complexity and smaller shapes, the gist will be there and no one would ever notice (or care) that you haven't done it "perfectly". If I would not show the reference, you would never know. Even with the reference there, it's still hard to tell exactly. And, after all, what would I gain by copying something "perfectly"? By "stylizing" these shapes, by intent or accident, I get to make some small decisions and introduce a bit of "me", I get to play around and explore possibilities, which is always rewarding. By mindlessly copying, I don't get anything but copy line lengths and exact degree angles. Not fun. Completely useless, if you ask me.
By the same token, you can then introduce new shapes and create a different design altogether, but that is a concept artist's job, it would take a lot of extra time, and I see no way it would benefit my purpose. I don't want to create a new design, and I don't want to rotate the form in my head and all that crap to prove random beginner stuff, it takes too much brain power, too much time, and I don't feel like proving anything, nor do I care about hiding the fact that I have copied it. All credit goes to the original designer, I am just a painter, I paint.
Comments
Post a Comment